Universal, school-based interventions to promote mental and emotional well-being: what is being done in the Uk and does it work? A systematic review

Loading

  1. Karen Mackenzieane,
  2. Christopher Williamsii
  1. 1 Psychological Services NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayrshire Central Infirmary, Irvine, UK
  2. 2 Mental Wellness and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Karen Mackenzie; karen.mackenzie{at}aapct.scot.nhs.uk

Abstract

Objectives The nowadays review aimed to assess the quality, content and testify of efficacy of universally delivered (to all pupils aged 5–16 years), school-based, mental wellness interventions designed to promote mental health/well-being and resilience, using a validated effect mensurate and provided within the UK in order to inform United kingdom schools-based well-beingness implementation.

Pattern A systematic review of published literature set inside UK mainstream school settings.

Data sources Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsychArticles, ASSIA and Psychological and Behavioural Sciences published between 2000 and April 2016.

Eligibility criteria Published in English; universal interventions that aimed to improve mental health/emotional well-beingness in a mainstream schoolhouse surroundings; school pupils were the straight recipients of the intervention; pre-post blueprint utilised assuasive comparing using a validated outcome mensurate.

Data extraction and synthesis 12 studies were identified including RCTs and non-controlled pre-mail designs (v principal school based, seven secondary school based). A narrative synthesis was applied with study quality check.ane

Results Effectiveness of school-based universal interventions was establish to be neutral or small with more positive furnishings plant for poorer quality studies and those based in primary schools (pupils aged 9–12 years). Studies varied widely in their use of measures and report pattern. Only 4 studies were rated 'excellent' quality. Methodological issues such as pocket-size sample size, varying course fidelity and lack of randomisation reduced overall report quality. Where in that location were several positive outcomes, effect sizes were minor, and methodological problems rendered many results to be interpreted with caution. Overall, results suggested a trend whereby higher quality studies reported less positive effects. The only study that conducted a health economic assay suggested the intervention was non price-constructive.

Conclusions The current bear witness suggests in that location are neutral to small furnishings of universal, school-based interventions in the Britain that aim to promote emotional or mental well-beingness or the prevention of mental health difficulties. Robust, long-term methodologies need to be pursued ensuring acceptable recording of fidelity, the employ of validated measures sensitive to mechanisms of change, reporting of those lost to follow-up and any adverse effects. Further high-quality and large-scale research is required beyond the UK in order to robustly exam any long-term benefits for pupils or on the wider educational or health arrangement.

  • school based
  • intervention
  • wellbeing
  • review
  • resilience
  • mental health

This is an open admission article distributed in accord with the Creative Commons Attribution four.0 Unported (CC Past 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

  • school based
  • intervention
  • wellbeing
  • review
  • resilience
  • mental health

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • Addressed a gap in the literature.

  • Used a robust methodology to review the literature in this area.

  • Conclusions will help inform UK policy and exercise equally this topic continues to be debated in current wellness, education and political spheres.

  • Included papers largely based in England so unlikely to exist representative of the cultural diversity within UK schools.

  • Appointment limit excluded papers published prior to 2000 and after April 2016. There were insufficient resources to update the literature search beyond this timepoint prior to publication.

Introduction

The mental and emotional well-being of children and young people has received increasing attention worldwide. It has been reported that the prevalence of mental health problems ranges from ten% to twenty%ii and that by the historic period of 18 years upwards to xx% of young people will have experienced an emotional disorder.3 Mental wellness conditions such as anxiety and low often persist into adulthood4 and have been associated with a range of negative outcomes including lower academic achievement, higher likelihood of health risk behaviours, self-impairment and suicide.five six Nevertheless, provision of services for those in need tin be equally low as 20%.seven Such access issues to specialist services like Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) has meant that school-based interventions have been increasingly explored due to their far reach8 and existing infrastructure to support kid development9 while noting that schools need back up to utilise the evidence base when applying such interventions.10

Numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses accept been conducted to review the effectiveness of schoolhouse-based mental health interventions at both the universal (delivered to all pupils irrespective of perceived need) and targeted (delivered to vulnerable or 'high risk' individuals only) levels. Overall, this literature has indicated mixed results regarding efficacy of school-based interventions.

Findings take suggested positive effects on social emotional skills, self-concept, positive social behaviours, conduct issues, emotional distress and problem solving when reviewing schoolhouse-based universal programmes aiming to enhance social and emotional skills.11 12 Further reviews found cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) formed the basis of the bulk of anxiety prevention programmes (78%) and over 75% of trials reported a meaning reduction in anxiety.xiii CBT-based interventions were also tentatively endorsed as mildly effective in reducing depression (Effect size [Eastward.S.].=0.29) and moderately effective (Eastward.S.=0.50) in reducing feet symptoms.14

With regards to optimal implementation, it has been noted that more positive outcomes were obtained for programmes adopting a 'whole-school' approach that lasted more than 1 year and aimed to promote mental health rather than forestall mental illness.12 A balance of both universal and targeted approaches has been recommended, along with accurate implementation of interventions.15

However, the long-term bear on and target audience of such initiatives has been questioned. A meta-analysis reviewing prevention of depression programmes found that while there was evidence of immediate postintervention effects, these did non sustain over fourth dimension (24–36 months).16 Moreover, a review evaluating both anxiety and depression programmes plant that while the majority were constructive for depression (65%) and feet (73%), the effect sizes were small (0.12–0.29).17

It has also been argued that universal prevention interventions are, overall, non efficacious,18 nineteen with targeted programmes being most effective (E.S.=0.21 to1.40). Likewise, that while school-based CBT programmes accept been demonstrated to lead to a brusque-term reduction in low symptoms, interventions are most effective for those in the clinical range.20

The literature has, therefore, conveyed conflicting results regarding the efficacy of universal school-based interventions while consistently highlighting methodological issues within the existing enquiry base. Common issues include a lack of active intervention controls;21 studies' operationalisation and measurements of 'resilience' lacking homogeneity22; that weak programme fidelity and treatment dosage impacts outcomes11; and that there is insufficient apply of validated, standardised measures and long-term follow-up.23

It is also noteworthy that the majority of reviews have focused worldwide, with most reviewed interventions based in Australia, the U.s.a. or Canada. No reviews to date have focused solely on studies in schools in the Britain. This trend was likewise referenced in a National Establish for Health and Care Excellence (Nice)-funded review24 of targeted and universal school-based interventions who noted that though findings from international based research are helpful, the generalisability to the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland educational organisation is questionable. Education system differences between countries and continents such as funding, political drivers, curriculum pressures and workforce planning problems give ascension to a demand for reviews specifically within the UK context, particularly while local funders and UK commissioners confront calls to address ascent mental health problems in schools. Therefore, it is especially timely to have access to the nearly relevant information fatigued from the current literature as it pertains to the Uk educational organisation specifically.

I systematic review of targeted school-based interventions within the UK enquiry has been conducted.25 This plant that nurture groups demonstrate an immediate positive impact on the social and emotional well-being on vulnerable young people; all the same, results from longer term follow-upward studies are less clear.

The need to carry out a review of universal school-based interventions specifically within the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland context therefore remains. This is especially pertinent in calorie-free of the increasing emphasis from national government on developing CAMHS services within the United kingdom, and the impetus on health and instruction services to work together in order to meliorate well-beingness outcomes for children and young people.26–28

Review aims

The nowadays review aims to fill this gap in the literature by focusing on universally delivered, school-based mental health interventions provided within the UK only. The post-obit questions will be explored:

  1. How effective are universal schoolhouse-based interventions in the Uk that promote mental health, emotional well-being or psychological resilience and what tools are existence used to measure effectiveness?

  2. What methodologies are being applied in UK schools when trialling interventions and what is the quality of these studies?

  3. What are the intervention characteristics, for example, delivery, content and target audience?

  4. What are the identified barriers in delivering and evaluating universal school-based interventions?

Search strategy

Electronic databases were searched for relevant published research on 14 April 2016: Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, ASSIA and Psychological and Behavioural Sciences. Selected journals relevant to the area were hand-searched (British Journal of Educational Psychology and British Journal of School Nursing). Previous reviews and relevant papers were reviewed, and following consultation with university librarians, keyword search terms were identified and linked with the Boolean operators 'AND' and 'OR' (see online supplementary file for search strategy examples).

Supplementary file 1

Study design criteria were wide to permit for the various range of methodologies used to overcome challenges in school-based research. Search terms were, therefore, called primarily to promote sensitivity to the bailiwick area. A limit date was gear up from 2000 to Apr 2016. The early date limit was selected equally this expanse has been promoted by U.k. governmental policy largely within the last decade. Furthermore, detailed appraisement of the previous systematic reviews in this area found few, if any, discovered studies prior to this date.

Study choice

The inclusion criteria were every bit follows:

  • The intervention was based in a mainstream schoolhouse surround.

  • The intervention was universal in its application (ie, to all pupils irrespective of demand).

  • Pupils were the direct recipients of the interventions.

  • The study adopted a pre-post design.

  • The intervention aimed to target mental health and/or emotional well-existence.

  • The study used a validated mensurate to quantitatively evaluate emotional or mental well-being outcomes and reported those outcomes.

  • The study was published in English between 2000 and April 2016 in a peer-reviewed journal.

Exclusion criteria included

  • The written report aims or methodology did non fit the inclusion criteria.

  • Any studies using a not-validated consequence measure equally their principal outcome, for example, Likert scales that were unvalidated.

  • Any studies using a purely qualitative methodology.

Details of included and excluded studies

Duplicate papers were excluded. Titles were screened to place just those that clearly met inclusion criteria. Abstracts were assessed independently by the authors. Raters met to compare included papers. Where eligibility was unclear based on the abstract, total articles were retrieved and assessed jointly past raters. Reference lists of included papers were searched as well as previous reviews on related topics. Articles citing included articles were also reviewed, and one paper was sourced via this method. Authors of protocol papers were contacted leading to an additional paper being sourced. Experts in the field in Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales were contacted regarding any other studies. However, none were eligible for inclusion. Twelve papers were included in the concluding review (meet figure one).

Quality rating of studies

The Downs and Black1 checklist was used to assess quality. This checklist assesses internal and external validity, selection bias and study ability over 27 items. This checklist was used due to its utility in assessing studies relating to public wellness and its applicability to assess quality in both randomised and non-randomised studies. Reliability and validity assessment has constitute the quality index to take loftier internal consistency, good examination–retest (r=0.88) and inter-rater (r=0.75) reliability and good confront and benchmark validity (0.90).one

A sample of papers were assessed by an independent researcher (CA). Any rating discrepancies were discussed and a shared decision reached. A decision was taken not to exclude any studies found to be of poor quality equally the aim of this current review was to critique universal school-based interventions while acknowledging that the real-earth implementation of such evaluations can exist challenging and, as a result, may reasonably touch on study quality.

Data extraction

Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, meta-assay was not appropriate. A narrative synthesis was applied to explain the findings of this review in line with current guidance.29 Data gathered from the studies included: study aim, intervention (model, duration and commitment), sample characteristics, study procedures, outcomes and measures, and results. Issues relating to the implementation, likewise as effectiveness, of interventions were also noted from those studies commenting on such barriers.

Patient and public involvement

No patients or members of the public were directly involved in this piece of research.

Results

Overview of interventions

Of the 12 studies sourced, five took identify in primary schools30–34 and vii took place in secondary schools.35–41 An overview of study interventions based in primary and secondary schools tin can be found in table ane.

View this table:

  • View inline

Tabular array 1

Overview of interventions based in master and secondary schools

Master schoolhouse studies

The v studies within primary schoolhouse settings evaluated interventions based on computerised CBT30; a teacher-led intervention embedded within the curriculum (eg, 'Promoting Culling Thinking Strategies' (PATHS)31); manualised anxiety interventions (eg, a locally adult anxiety intervention or the Australian developed 'FRIENDS' plan) delivered by both school staff (teachers and nurses) and external wellness staff (eg, psychologists).32–34

Secondary school studies

Three of the secondary schoolhouse-based studies trialled interventions based on CBT principles (eg, Great britain Resilience Programme (UKRP) and Resourceful Adolescent Programme (RAP-United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland)36 39 41) delivered by schoolhouse staff,36 educational psychologists39 and external facilitators.41 Interventions were also said to include principles of interpersonal therapy (RAP-UK41) and behavioural approaches (Thinking about Reward in Young People ('TRY'39)).

Ane study trialled an intervention based on positive psychology,35 two studies trialled a mindfulness-based intervention38 39 and two trialled locally adult mental health pedagogy sessions delivered to all pupils.37 40 These interventions were led past trained school teachers35 38 forty and trained volunteers.37 All delivered the intervention during Personal Health and Social Education (PHSE) classes.

Methodological quality

The quality of studies ranged from 'poor' (34%30; 37.5%35) to 'excellent' (75%34 37; 78.1%36; 81.three%41).

6 studies used a randomised controlled pre-postal service design.xxx–32 34 37 41 The remaining were not-randomised pre-post designs, and only one did non have a control group.33 Some studies were specially weak on their description of sample characteristics and representation of the population,30 35 reporting of those lost to follow-up and accounting for those in the analysis,32 35 and the exploring of adverse events, of which only i study provided data.41 Simply vi studies provided a power calculation,31 34 36 37 xl 41 about of which had samples sufficiently powered to make up one's mind an upshot (except ref 37). The remaining studies did not provide such information.

Of the 11 studies employing controls, vi used controls from the same schoolhouse in which the intervention was taking identify.32 34 36 37 39 All other studies recruited controls from unlike schools.

Sample sizes ranged from 1330 to 5075.31 The age of participants ranged from 431 to sixteen years old38 41 with the bulk of studies targeting the early adolescent historic period range (9–12 years former) at the terminate of main school or at the commencement of junior/secondary school.30 32 34–37

Effectiveness of interventions

An overview of study characteristics and outcomes tin can exist found in tables two and three.

View this table:

  • View inline

Table 2

Design and result characteristics of main-school based studies

View this table:

  • View inline

Tabular array iii

Design and outcome characteristics of secondary school-based studies

Data collection and measurement

Studies varied widely in their apply of measures. Measures used to charge per unit depressive symptoms included the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI),36 the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)39 41 and the Centre for Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale (CES-D).38 Measures used to rate anxiety included the Revised Children'southward Anxiety and Low Scale,34 41 Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale,36 Penn State Worry questionnaire41 and the Spence anxiety scale.30 32 33 Measures used to capture different methods of coping related to symptoms of anxiety or low included: Children's Automated Thoughts Scale,41 Coping Strategy Indicator,32 Judgement Completion for Events in the By Test39 and Perceived Stress Scale.38 Two studies used measures related specifically to well-being or resilience: Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)38 and the Resilience Calibration,37 and others used measures related to self-esteem33 34 41 and life satisfaction.35 The Forcefulness and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was the most commonly used measure said to rate behavioural, emotional difficulties and overall functioning, and either the child, parent or teacher version was used in half-dozen of the 12 studies.xxx 31 33 36 37 40 Studies varied co-ordinate to the length of follow-upward ranging from 4 weeks37 to 2 years.41 Four of the 12 studies sought to obtain qualitative, also as quantitative data.30 35 37 41 Nonetheless, information technology was across the telescopic of this paper to comment on qualitative findings.

Due to the heterogeneity of studies, the effectiveness of each intervention arroyo will exist discussed in turn. Overall, results suggested a trend whereby higher quality studies reported less positive furnishings.

Studies trialling bespoke mental wellness teaching programmes (n=335 37 40; – all in secondary schools).

Two studies establish small (d=0.11–0.22) but pregnant improvements in total and subscale SDQ scores for those that received mental wellness instruction. Withal, of those, it is noteworthy that Chisholm et al 37 did not employ a non-intervention condition. Boniwell et al 35 trialled a bespoke intervention based on positive psychology principles and institute a subtract in outcomes of life satisfaction and an increase in negative impact for both groups. However, this was less so for the intervention grouping (d=−0.24 compared with d=−0.79), which was interpreted as the intervention having a 'buffering issue' at a time of stress for the pupils.

Studies trialling CBT-based interventions (n=eight; 30–34,36,39,41). These are described by setting (primary and then secondary).

Primary schools

All chief-school based studies trialled interventions pertaining to altering thinking styles based on CBT principles. Four studies, 3 of which employed a control arm, reported statistically positive outcomes on anxiety-related measures following interventions including FRIENDS,33 34 'Retrieve Experience Do'thirty and locally developed CBT programmes32 with larger effects for those in 'high risk' groups (d=−1.2633; no control arm). Methodological issues such every bit a small sample size and significant group differences at baseline (n=1330), failure to include those lost to follow-upward in analysis,32 lack of controls33 and small effect sizes for universal samples (d=0.01–0.2)34 should exist noted when taking inference from those results. Mixed results were found in relation to delivery, with stronger effects constitute in interventions led by health professionals (d=0.2) versus school staff (d=0.02),34 or no difference between psychologist or teacher-led interventions.32 A sufficiently powered, good quality study evaluating the utilise of PATHS within the curriculum constitute few, modest meaning results (d=0.06–0.14; teacher-rated intervention measure out) at 12-month follow-up and no effects on any mensurate at 24-month follow-up.31

Secondary schools

Fewer significant outcomes were found in trials based within secondary school populations. Small (d=0.093) merely curt-lived positive outcomes were institute on the CDI for those in the UKRP intervention.36 Mixed results were plant for those in the RAP-U.k. intervention, with results indicating some beneficial and also potentially negative outcomes41 although all with small effect sizes. Both were high-quality, longitudinal, well-powered studies employing robust methodologies. Furthermore, no furnishings were found in the CBT group when compared with as-usual controls or other treatments in a smaller written report looking at mechanisms of modify.39 In the same study, a behavioural intervention (Endeavour) was found to have positive effects on reward-seeking behaviour and SMFQ measure (d=−0.8) when compared with other treatments; notwithstanding, this finding was not confirmed when compared with PHSE-as-usual controls.

Studies using mindfulness-based interventions (due north=238 39; - both in secondary schools).

Positive outcomes were found in a feasibility written report evaluating a mindfulness-based intervention,38 which yielded statistically pregnant, modest furnishings on both depression (CES-D: d=−0.24) and well-being (WEMWBS: d=0.15) measures. Due to small sample sizes, this study was likely to be underpowered; even so, outcomes were sustained at 3-month follow-up and were associated with greater mindfulness practice. No significant outcomes were establish in a smaller study trialling MBCT on measures of mood (SMFQ) or reward-seeking.39

Implementation issues

Common issues relating to implementation were constitute beyond all studies.

Fidelity

Allegiance to intervention commitment was highlighted as an result in terms of both measurement and result. Studies used cocky-rated fidelity methods,32 external fidelity ratings on a proportion of sessions31 34 36 37 41 or no fidelity rating methods reported at all. Studies commented variably on the possible issue of fidelity and 'treatment dosage' on outcomes. In Stallard et al's37 study, the wellness-led condition with 100% fidelity (ie, administered all pieces of homework and activity tasks), was associated with significantly better outcomes than the schoolhouse-led group who achieved 60%–fourscore% fidelity. 'Loftier quality' workshops were too found to exist related to greater declines in CDI measures.36 Conversely, Berry et al 31 found that allegiance (when applying an arbitrary '80%' rate of 'high' fidelity) was non found to be related to outcome.

Attrition

Investment from schools was raised as an event as demonstrated by school participation and attrition31 41 and failure to administer follow-up measures every bit per study procedures.32 35 All studies, with the exception of Stallard et al,41 provided little information about schoolhouse or participant characteristics of those who dropped out. This confounding factor may have positively biased results. For instance, in Kuyken et al's38 report, teachers who delivered the mindfulness intervention had been invested in the intervention for approximately 2 years earlier the commencement of the study and attended regular supervision, demonstrating expert motivation throughout the written report that establish positive outcomes.

Costs

2 studies actively explored health economic costs involved.31 41 Cost-effectiveness was non calculated by Berry et al 31 due to lack of impact, and Stallard et al 41 concluded that the intervention was not cost-effective. Of note, both studies may have sustained loftier costs due to employing external facilitators to pb the intervention rather than teachers41 and hiring 'coach consultants' to monitor commitment.31

Discussion

This review aimed to explore the effectiveness and study quality of universally delivered schoolhouse-based interventions within the UK that aim to promote mental health and emotional well-existence. Several articulate conclusions tin be drawn from this review, while other issues require farther clarity from futurity research.

How effective are universal school-based interventions in the UK that promote mental health, emotional well-beingness or psychological resilience?

Based on the studies included in this review, the effectiveness of universal school-based interventions remains mixed and, at all-time, modest. Where in that location were several positive outcomes, effect sizes were small and methodological problems rendered many results to be interpreted with caution. This prudent finding echoes the somewhat mixed results from worldwide reviews,11–24 where while several positive evaluations exist, this finding is not consequent when applied across diverse settings and populations, which calls into question the overall generalisability of school-based interventions in the literature to real-world environments.

Notwithstanding, this current review focusing solely on UK schools found that studies based in primary schools seemed to find more encouraging results from CBT-based interventions on measures of anxiety, although most studies had methodological limitations relating to apply of appropriate controls and failure to include those lost to follow-up in analysis. Positive results tended to fall in the older age range of primary school pupils (9–12 years onetime).

Within the secondary school population, the most positive results were obtained when delivering mental health pedagogy sessions, behavioural or mindfulness interventions. Two high powered, practiced quality studies evaluating CBT-based interventions within secondary populations institute few significant results, and one report indicated possible detrimental impacts of the intervention compared with controls, although any issue sizes related to these findings were small.

It is curious that studies fail to observe promising effects in the older, secondary school, population. It could be argued that a two-yr follow-up is not sufficient to truly detect modify or prevention during the developmentally sensitive fourth dimension that is adolescence. Arguably, the demands placed on adolescents but change in nature rather than impact over fourth dimension. Adolescent psychosocial development42 is particularly vulnerable as individuals are required to manage academic demands as they progress through their school career, navigate friendships, seek to develop cocky-identities and deal with the physiological changes that occur as they transition through puberty. It could be that the existence of such pervasive and fluctuating stressors juxtaposed with measurement issues, discussed beneath, contribute to the failure to detect significant results in secondary school populations. Or, that such interventions merely take less affect for this population.

What methodologies are being applied in Uk schools when trialling interventions and what is the quality of these studies?

Methodological issues were predominant in this review. Simply four of the studies were of 'excellent' quality, and findings indicated a tendency towards higher quality papers finding fewer positive results. Studies were weakened largely due to their lack of randomisation and blinding of researchers, and pocket-sized sample sizes that likely rendered them underpowered to detect true furnishings.

While it was encouraging that initial consenting rates were high and remained reasonable throughout, study quality would benefit from better reporting of those lost to follow-upward who, maybe, could be a population of particular interest when considering the objective of promoting mental and emotional well-being for all within the school setting. Furthermore, statistical methods used to account for such missing information require careful consideration to ensure that more than stringent and conservative methods — for example, intent-to-treat analyses — are applied in school-based research. Otherwise, studies that instead apply a 'defined completers' or 'completers' analysis expose themselves to the chance of yielding false positives.

Some other issue was the use of controls. Few studies explicitly provided details of the content controls groups received. Some indicated that controls may have already received materials available in the schoolhouse effectually social and emotional well-being, which could reasonably have confounded results. Additionally, considering the demographic information provided, it is unlikely that the included studies accurately represent the cultural diversity of schools beyond the Great britain; therefore, caution should exist taken when considering the generalisability of results.

The terminal prominent upshot highlighted in this written report was the diverse use of measures and length of follow-up across studies, making it hard to define a coherent picture of measurement and effects in the electric current enquiry base.

Every bit commented in one study36 and further afield,22 measurement issues within universal populations are peculiarly problematic due to mutual floor effects, particularly when using measures pertaining to the being of mental health conditions. As has been well documented, demonstrating improvement in 'loftier risk' groups is somewhat easier every bit baseline scores are often elevated providing scope for reduction.41 Demonstrating change within a universal population is therefore inherently more than difficult and requires careful thought when moving forrard. Is it sufficient that the absence of a mental health condition equates to greater well-being or resilience as suggested by Boniwell et al,35 or should researchers direct attention to explicitly measuring well-being and resilience and mechanisms of change inside such constructs in guild to truly operationalise factors relating to the prevention of mental health difficulties?

Few studies in this review used well-being or resilience measures. However, those that did37 38 found positive furnishings. While whatever meaning of these results must be taken with caution due to methodological bug, this nevertheless suggests that such measures are at least able to detect change inside a universal population.

Only one written report explored mechanisms of change39 by using cognitive reasoning tests when comparison several interventions and found that a behavioural intervention led to more reward seeking and a reduction in mood symptoms. Information technology would be of value to explore this farther given the neurodevelopmental stage of early adolescence when frontal lobes are still maturing and neuronal connections continue to grow.43 Consequently, the adolescent'due south ability to plan, trouble solve and manipulate abstract information, as is arguably necessary in cognitive-based interventions, may be over-ridden past more disinhibited, emotionally driven impulses and the seeking of physical rewards, as may be seen in earlier adolescence and would potentially explain increased receptiveness to a behavioural rather than cognitive intervention.

It could also exist of value that future studies take a more than holistic perspective of full general well-beingness during evaluation of universal populations. Such indicators may include schoolhouse omnipresence, exam completion, referrals rates to local CAMHS, academic outcomes, long-term mental and physical health outcomes, occupational or further instruction uptake, equally well equally important qualitative components.

What are the identified barriers in delivering and evaluating universal schoolhouse-based interventions?

Implementation barriers relating to allegiance to intervention delivery and costs were likewise raised inside this review. Variance in fidelity measurement to confirm reliable manualised delivery was a recurring issue, which is of particular salience when delivery has been consistently argued to be related to outcome.11 13 Intervention delivery itself varied between studies where schoolhouse staff or external researchers delivered the courses. While results were mixed when comparing the effectiveness of teacher-led versus externally led interventions, overall within this review, the results were neutral suggesting, at best, that there is no negative impact of teacher delivery. While issues relating to treatment allegiance may be more prominent with teacher delivery, considering sustainability, it could be argued that this would be the optimal approach in schoolhouse settings, especially considering the fiscal costs involved in employing external facilitators as demonstrated by two studies in this review.31 41 Furthermore, research has indicated that pupils adopt both that mental health education be delivered past someone with a thorough knowledge of the subject and for it to be delivered by someone they know, for case, a teacher.44

No study in this review explored the impact on whatever centrolineal services such every bit CAMHS. For case, it may be useful to audit local CAMHS referral rates while reviewing the effectiveness of school-based interventions, and whether an increase or subtract in referrals would exist observed. Considering the absence of reliable positive outcomes at the individual level at this point, a systemic perspective could be of value when considering whatever toll benefits to the wider wellness and social care services.

Furthermore, it was unclear from the review what local or national political or strategic drivers instigated each study, and indeed, the extent to which children and young people were consulted in the procedure, design and commitment of the interventions. It was outside the scope of this review to explore the qualitative findings from the few studies that employed focus groups. Therefore, it is recommended that future qualitative reviews of school-based research are conducted in club to ensure that children's and young people's views equally stakeholders in this work are sufficiently represented.

Limitations

This report was limited in its ability to source evaluations representative of the unabridged UK equally the majority of studies were based in England. While efforts were fabricated to source evaluations from elsewhere in the U.k., the lack of validated measures or application of pre-postal service methodology meant that such evaluations from the 'grey literature' could non be included in this review. It should therefore be noted that there is much relevant work being conducted in schools beyond the UK. Nonetheless, schools and local authorities should be urged to reliably evaluate their valuable efforts and contribute to the published literature, thereby demonstrating the important work existence driven by teachers and policymakers nationwide.

This written report was as well limited in its engagement source in that only studies from the year 2000 were included in this review. While results from other systematic reviews suggested that little relevant inquiry was washed in the Britain before this time, it could even so be that some studies were missed due to this limit.

Implications

This review highlighted the need to apply robust methodological designs within schoolhouse-based research in order for any effects to exist interpreted meaningfully. Measurement issues be where they do not adequately detect alter in universal populations, and there is a wide variety of measures used ranging from 'clinical' to well-being measures. This review concludes that school-based researchers across the Uk should attempt to come together to talk over ways to address this issue and amend coherence in the literature.

An additional, imperative implication from this review is the proactive inclusion and involvement of teachers in this work. Every bit has been commented elsewhere45 without the 'buy-in' from teachers, any school-based intervention is less probable to sustain or achieve positive outcomes. In a time of boosted pressures on teachers, the demand to feel in control of initiatives is key. Of notation, ii of the studies in this review included adult-focused exercises for the teachers themselves as an offshoot to the intervention training. This approach may go further to assist teachers' stress management and understanding of mental health while attending to the needs of their pupils.

Conclusions

The current prove suggests there are neutral to minor effects of universal, schoolhouse-based interventions in the UK that aim to promote emotional or mental well-being or prevention of mental health difficulties. While the real-world limitations of conducting inquiry in schools exists, robust, long-term methodologies need to be attempted when conducting enquiry in this area in order to explore the longitudinal touch on of school-based interventions on well-being. Academic attainment, school omnipresence and rates of loftier-risk presentations besides need to be further explored. This requires adequate recording of allegiance, the utilize of validated measures sensitive to mechanisms of change, reporting of those lost to follow-up and whatsoever adverse effects and the use of qualitative data to supplement quantitative outcomes. Interventions in the existing UK-based literature include educational, behavioural, cognitive and mindfulness components, each demonstrating variable results. Still, national and local policy26–28 46 indicates that in that location remains an appetite to develop work in this area in order to promote well-being outcomes for children and young people. In this case, further research collaborations are required across the UK to robustly demonstrate whatever benefits for pupils or on the wider system.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Dr Claire Adey (CA) who assisted in the quality rating procedure.

References

  1. one.↵
  2. 2.↵
  3. iii.↵
  4. iv.↵
  5. five.↵
  6. six.↵
  7. vii.↵

    Globe Wellness Organization. Atlas: Child and Adolescent Mental Wellness Resource: Global Concerns, Implications for the Future: WHO, 2005.

  8. 8.↵
  9. ix.↵
  10. 10.↵
  11. 11.↵
  12. 12.↵
  13. 13.↵
  14. 14.↵
  15. 15.↵
  16. 16.↵
  17. 17.↵
  18. xviii.↵
  19. nineteen.↵
  20. 20.↵
  21. 21.↵
  22. 22.↵
  23. 23.↵
  24. 24.↵
  25. 25.↵
  26. 26.↵
  27. 27.↵
  28. 28.↵
  29. 29.↵
  30. thirty.↵
  31. 31.↵
  32. 32.↵
  33. 33.↵
  34. 34.↵
  35. 35.↵
  36. 36.↵
  37. 37.↵
  38. 38.↵
  39. 39.↵
  40. 40.↵
  41. 41.↵
  42. 42.↵
  43. 43.↵
  44. 44.↵
  45. 45.↵
  46. 46.↵

Request Permissions

If y'all wish to reuse any or all of this article please utilize the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Eye'southward RightsLink service. Yous will be able to go a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information:

© Author(due south) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-apply permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open up access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution iv.0 Unported (CC BY four.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/past/4.0/.